Often Overlooked, Sisters Are At Equality Forefront

What do you know about nuns?

nuns

Image by neil1877 via Flickr

I’m not talking about the caricatured, stereotyped and ridiculous portrayals by movies, television and popular culture (Dead Man Walking and a few others excepted). You’ve probably seen pictures of nuns marching for civil rights in the sixties. You may heard of the selfless sacrifices made by sisters in the missionary field. And you may know a sister (or two) who have changed your life for the better.

I do. Several, in fact.

Sisters have been on the cutting edge of social issues (it can be argued) for over a thousand years- much of the hierarchy cannot claim even a fraction of the social justice work these women have accomplished. They have been working (often very quietly) to keep the fundamental message of Jesus alive- the message that compassion, dignity and respect is the only response to every human person.

What you may not know is this: they are also some of the fiercest advocates of social justice for LGBT persons.

New Ways Ministry, a Catholic organization dedicated to promoting understanding and dignity for LGBT persons, has an excellent blog post about the work of religious sisters for LGBT equality. Excerpt:

It’s no secret–though it’s not well-known, either–that high on the list of Catholic supporters of LGBT equality are nuns.  Communities of women religious have consistently been supportive of education, dialogue, and justice activities for LGBT people since the late 1970s.

After Vatican II, when nuns’ communities re-evaluated their charisms and ministries, they quickly realized that the church had long neglected lesbian/gay rights and that this was an issue that cried for justice.  They responded positively and actively.

Johnson’s article  highlights the reason that nuns can be so steadfast:

“American nuns don’t want to fight the official church, but neither are they likely to sacrifice the integrity of their consciences for the sake of peace.”

At New Ways Ministry,  we are indebted to our Sisters for financial, spiritual, and practical support over our 35 year history.  More New Ways Ministry programs have been held in convents and motherhouses than in any other type of Catholic facility by far.

Read the full post here– and follow their blog on Twitter– it’s a heartening voice in a religious climate that is often far from charitable.

So if you have a negative view about nuns, consider changing your mind. And if you know a sister who’s braving the forefront of equality- thank them. Send them this post, in fact.

We owe them more than we think.

Related articles

Catholics and Gays: Joel Connelly Calls Out The Church

The Seattle PI’s Joel Connelly has an illustrious history of commentary in Seattle. I’ve enjoyed him for years. But in Monday’s Seattle Post-Intelligencer, he makes one of the best cases for the Catholic Church to give up the paranoid same-sex marriage rhetoric- and his seasoned, well-reasoned thoughts beg to be shared. Excerpt:

English: Schwörstadt: Catholic Church Deutsch:...

The bishops see themselves as shepherds, but American Catholics are not sheep.  They think and act independently.  A recent survey by the Public Religion Research Institute found that nearly three quarters of Catholics favor letting gays and lesbians marry (43 percent) or form civil unions (31 percent).

“Catholics are more supportive of legal recognitions of same-sex relationships than members of any other Christian tradition and Americans overall,” the survey concluded.

The church is also hurting itself:  Its social activism, defense of human dignity and witness to peace should make it a beacon for all who seek justice.  Instead, the church is pilloried as an instrument of reaction.

Its wounds are self inflicted, a classic case of clerical error.  As the National Catholic Reporter put it, editorializing after New York legislators approved marriage equality last spring:

“Even if the bishops had a persuasive case to make and the legislative tools at their disposal, their public conduct in recent years — wholesale excommunications, railing at politicians, denial of honorary degrees and speaking platforms at Catholic institutions, using the Eucharist as a political bludgeon, refusing to entertain any questions or dissenting opinions, and engaging in open warfare with the community’s thinkers as well as those, especially women, who have loyally served the church — has resulted in a kind of episcopal caricature, the common scolds of the religion world, the caustic party of ‘no’.”

Connelly is taking a fair and balanced approach, using the Catholic tradition of social justice and charity to argue for the reality of human experience- in this case the reality of same-sex relationships. The very reality of them flies in the face of the “Natural Law‘ argument:

“Jesus befriended those who were marginalized because He knew it was only in the security of loving, unconditional relationships that hearts and lives are healed,” argues writer Justin Cannon, reflecting the Christian faith as taught to us by Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.

Not only healed, but enriched.  I’ve witnessed a warm, very traditional moment over the years.  A goofy, dreamy smile crosses the face of a friend, who after years of playing the field announces  “Well, I met this woman (or guy)!”  It signals a readiness to settle down.  My natural reaction is to say,   “You lucky dog!” and to be there, in affection and support, when the knot is tied.

Life together is a natural passage in life.  Yet, according to “natural law” the Catholic church frowns on my friends who fall in love with somebody of their own gender.  It violates nature, according to a U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops statement, because such “inherently non-procreative” relationships “cannot be given the status of marriage.”

The church’s positions are, as state Sen. Ed Murray put it Friday night, “hurtful” as well as contradictory.

Out of one side of its mouth, the church condemns “all forms of unjust discrimination, harrassment and abuse” against gays and lesbians. At the same time, the Cathechism of the Catholic Church describes “deep-seated homosexual tendencies” as “objectively disordered.”

As my critical thinking professor at Carroll College taught me, the Church’s argument is flawed. It can’t have it both ways. It either acknowledges the reality of same-sex relationships- the reality of the complexity  of human love as a gift from God- or it becomes the ubiquitous symbol of fantasy, its credibility falling off the edge of its own absurdly flattened earth.

Connelly’s brave, full essay is here.

Janus, Chaz, Hillary, The Military, Barack, Science And HIV

Français : Demi-statère de Rome, tête de Janus...

Image via Wikipedia

(Also Published on LGBTQNation)
Janus was the Roman God of Thresholds, of transition, of beginnings and ending. He is often depicted with two faces, one for looking forward and one for looking back. January, the beginning month of the new year is named for Janus, and so, it’s natural that humans take this time to look back- and look forward- at the approach of the New Year.

As I take a look back, I’m very grateful for some amazing things that have happened this year in the U.S.- things that I never thought would happen in my lifetime- including:

All good stuff.

But what I am finding amazing is the conspicuous absence or light mentions in the LGBT media about the dramatic advances in HIV treatment and prevention in the “best of” roundups this year. A year when there have arguably been more advances in treatment, prevention and scientific breakthroughs than in any other year in the 30 since AIDS was discovered. A year when top government officials committed time, money and policy to ending this disease. A year when Science magazine called the HPTN 052 Study the scientific breakthrough of the year.

It’s puzzling.

Are we getting complacent about HIV? Are we in denial about the very real danger it still poses to our community? Do people understand that having HIV is difficult- creating financial, medical, emotional and social problems that can be devastating for people, families and communities?

It seems so.

I am, like I said, grateful for all the things listed above. I am grateful for Chaz and trans representation. I am grateful for relationship rcognition. I am grateful for advances in employment nondiscrimination. I am grateful that my government is taking LGBT rights seriously. I am especially grateful that the elected administration of this land is treating HIV like it should be treated- as a disease, a viral infection- and not as some Divine Punishment inflicted on the sexually and socially repugnant dregs of society. That is a big deal.

In fact it’s huge.

So why did we miss it?

The Catholic Hierarchy: “Suffer The Little Children.”

Illinois Catholic bishops are taking their ball and going home in the face of federal non-discrimination requirements for foster care and adoption. The New York Times:

Children of the United Kingdom's Children's Mi...

Image via Wikipedia

Roman Catholic bishops in Illinois have shuttered most of the Catholic Charities affiliates in the state rather than comply with a new requirement that says they must consider same-sex couples as potential foster-care and adoptive parents if they want to receive state money. The charities have served for more than 40 years as a major link in the state’s social service network for poor and neglected children.

The bishops have followed colleagues in Washington, D.C., and Massachusetts who had jettisoned their adoption services rather than comply with nondiscrimination laws.

The vilification of LGBT persons by the hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church is quickly becoming hysterical paranoia. What I find interesting is that it flies in the face of most of the opinions of people in the pews as well as the experience of many of the clergy and bishops themselves. They know gay people, they minister to gay people, and- I know this from personal experience- many of them are gay people.

Yet, this real-life, personal experience has no credibility in the face of freakishly ideological edicts from Rome. It’s absolutely backward. The experience of the people is supposed to form the church, form the hierarchy.

Not to mention the disregard for social and biological science. This is a church that would rather let the little children suffer. It saddens me.

Where’s the love, people?

Read the full story here

“The Race To End AIDS”

On Today’s Morning Edition from NPR, a story about HIV Treatment As Prevention:

AIDS Awareness

2011 has been a momentous year in the 30-year-old AIDS pandemic.

The big breakthrough was the discovery that antiviral drugs can prevent someone who’s infected with HIV from passing the virus to others. It’s nearly 100 percent effective. That led President Obama to declare earlier this month that the U.S. will expand HIV treatment in hard-hit countries by 50 percent.

As recently as last year, many of those experts were saying that just giving more people with HIV more drugs would never work. “For every one person that was put on antiretroviral therapy or treatment, we would have two to three new infections identified,” Dr. Eric Goosby, U.S. Global AIDS coordinator, says.

It looked like a losing game, but not anymore.

The new research shows that antiviral drugs not only save the lives of infected people, they also stop people from spreading the virus and causing new infections, if the drugs can be given early enough after someone gets infected. The new strategy is called “treatment as prevention.”

“So we suddenly are looking at a moment where we can treat our way out of the epidemic,” Goosby says. “That’s the turning point that we’re looking at.” Still, it’ll take decades to end AIDS, according to experts. But many say the world has to be much more aggressive about treating HIV.

But just the fact that this is being reported on and is being taken seriously is a big deal.

You can read and/or listen to the whole story here

The Real Catholic Response To LGBT Persons

…is set forth in this week’s America magazine– a journal by American Jesuits.

The landmark Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church s...

Image via Wikipedia

After the Cardinal Archbishop of Chicago compared gays and the KKK, after all the fear-mongering anti-marriage rhetoric thrown out by the Catholic hierarchy, finally, a cautious voice of reason:

In mid-December Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made a passionate speech in Geneva on the occasion of International Human Rights Day, encouraging nations to support human rights for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered people. Much of what she says can, and should, be supported by Catholics. Same-sex marriage has been strongly opposed by the church. But Mrs. Clinton’s speech is referring to the more fundamental right of gay and lesbian people to live without fear and without threat of death. Americans may have become so focused on the question of same-sex marriage that they overlook the dire conditions under which many gay and lesbian people live throughout the world.

In Uganda, for example, there are moves to make homosexual activity punishable by death. This is extreme, but Uganda is far from an isolated case. In Kenya conviction brings up to 14 years in prison; in Tanzania up to life in prison; and in Saudi Arabia the penalties include fines, whipping, prison and death. As Mrs. Clinton said, “It is a violation of human rights when people are beaten or killed because of their sexual orientation….” The Catechism teaches that gays and lesbians should be accepted with respect, sensitivity and compassion: “Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided.” The church should continue to raise its voice in defense of our gay and lesbian brothers and sisters who suffer unjust discrimination.

Bravo, America Magazine. It’s a good reminder- and a fair beginning.

After My Own Heart

A.J. Otjen, University of Montana Professor and 2010 GOP Congressional Candidate has an Op-Ed in the Missoulian that flies in the face of the arguments by Treasure State Politics about LGBT rights (see previous post) and takes on the Montana GOP’s Notorious Platform Plank:

Montana Republican Party

Image via Wikipedia

(The) Montana Supreme Court heard an appeal giving same-sex couples the protections that heterosexual couples enjoy. We should demand that our Republican leaders support this decision. But, the Montana Republican party platform says homosexual acts should remain illegal.

Apparently, the party that favors smaller, less intrusive government wants bigger, more intrusive government when it comes to our domestic arrangements. Three’s a crowd in the bedroom, folks.

Worse, the party line doesn’t fit with what most Republicans think. The latest Gallup poll says that 85 percent of Republicans want their candidates to focus on the economy, not social issues.

It will be increasingly difficult for Republicans to win general elections if party leaders try to block the Supreme Court ruling or this troubling clause stays in the Republican state platform. Almost two-thirds of independents supported legalizing same-sex marriage in a 2010 Gallup poll.

Anecdotal evidence from online posts shows thousands of voters saying they would vote Republican except for the GOP’s rigid stance on gay issues.

Almost one-third of Republicans supported legalizing same-sex marriage in the 2010 Gallup poll. Over 70 percent of 18- to 34-year-olds support legalizing same-sex marriage, up 16 percentage points from 2010. This “overwhelming” number in favor of marriage equality “makes the trend toward growing acceptance both clear and unstoppable,” says Jon Walker at Firedoglake. (emphases mine)


I am delighted and cautiously optimistic.

Of course I want her to be a bellwether, and having A.J. Otjen singing “The Times, They Are A-Changing” (with statistics) might be the wake-up call the Montana GOP needs. But will they hear it?

The Tea-Party Christianists seem to have a loud voice, if not large numbers- and the fact that this plank was “sneaked in” past the majority of delegates- as some maintain- doesn’t leave me with a helluva lot of faith in the process.

I want to believe it. I do. I like what she’s singin’, God bless her. It’s rational, reasonable, and backed by scientific data.

But I know a few people who’ll run to unplug the speakers as fast as they can. Especially because it’s rational, reasonable and backed by scientific data.

Sigh.

Stay tuned- and read the whole piece here.

Family Foundation Features Speaker Comparing Obama to Hitler


Group Spirals Down the Rabbit Hole of Extremist Conspiracies

The Montana Family Foundation is featuring a speaker at fundraising events in Bozeman and Billings this week who is popular with Tea Partiers, because she compares Adolph Hitler’s Third Reich to President Barack Obama’s policies.  Kitty Werthmann has claimed President Obama is seeking to finish what Hitler started, and she has admitted that many people think she’s “a wacko.”[1]

“This is the latest indication that the Montana Family Foundation is going beyond the Religious Right’s traditional ‘culture war’ issues,” says the Montana Human Rights Network’s Travis McAdam.  “In recent years, they’ve also promoted the absurd notions that President Obama is not an American citizen and that socialism is taking over the country.  Kitty Werthmann headlining their fundraising events just demonstrates the Family Foundation’s extremism.”

The Montana Human Rights Network issued a briefing paper today (see below) outlining the Family Foundation’s formation and its work under the leadership of Jeff Laszloffy.  It also details their promotion of extreme right-wing beliefs that mesh with the Tea Party Movement.  The briefing outlines how Laszloffy and the Family Foundation supported efforts during the 2011 Montana Legislature to make President Obama prove he is an American citizen.  It also discusses the Family Foundation’s increased paranoia about socialism taking over the country and contains an overview of Kitty Werthmann.

“Jeff Laszloffy and the Family Foundation have tried to position themselves as a credible organization since forming in 2004,” says McAdam.  “Featuring activists like Werthmann and trumpeting conspiracy theories related to President Obama’s citizenship erode any sense of legitimacy they may have accumulated.”

 

Jeff Laszloffy and the Montana Family Foundation:

Promoting “Birthers” and Hitler-Obama Comparisons

 

Montana Family Foundation

 

The Montana Family Foundation, a state-level affiliate of the Religious Right powerhouse Focus on the Family, started in 2004.  At that time, some board members from an entity that was originally the Christian Coalition of Montana broke away from that organization to start the Family Foundation.  At the time, the Montana Human Rights Network noted that this tactical shift by Religious Rights activists in Montana mirrored what was happening at the national level.[2]

Following his run for the Republican presidential nomination in 1988, Pat Robertson formed the Christian Coalition of America.  It was the major player at the nexus of Religious Right organizations and Republican politics over the next decade.  Its annual “Road to Victory” conferences served both as Republican rallies and trainings about the nuts-and-bolts of political organizing.[3]  The Christian Coalition of Montana brought this fusion of right-wing theology and conservative political activism to the state when it formed in 1992.[4]

As offensive comments by Pat Robertson increased the amount of political baggage associated with the Christian Coalition at the national level, the centers of Religious Right power shifted.  As Robertson continued to lose credibility and the Christian Coalition of America lost its tax-exempt status due to its overt GOP politicking, Dr. James Dobson and his Focus on the Family were more than capable of stepping in to fill the void.  The switch in national power to Focus on the Family was smooth, as Dobson and his group already engaged in conservative politics.[5]

This transition in Religious Right power played out in Montana as well with the creation of the Montana Family Foundation.  The Christian Coalition of Montana transformed into the Montana Family Coalition in 2001. Board members of the Family Coalition left to form the Montana Family Foundation in 2004.  When the Montana Secretary of State dissolved the Montana Family Coalition in 2005, the Montana Family Foundation grew into the leading Religious Right organization in Montana.[6]

Those involved with the Montana Family Foundation may need to, once again, create a new entity if the organization continues to stray from its stated mission.  On its website, the Family Foundation says it is “dedicated to supporting, protecting and strengthening Montana families.”[7]  However, the group increasingly engages in issues that appear to fall outside of its stated purpose.  These include:  promoting conspiracy theories about President Obama not being a US citizen; featuring speakers who equate President Obama with Adolph Hitler; and claiming that America is embracing socialism.

Jeff Laszloffy, President of the Montana Family Foundation

Upon its formation in 2004, the Montana Family Foundation announced that its leader would be state Rep. Jeff Laszloffy (R-Laurel).  The group said he would retire from state politics to take over leadership of the organization.  For much of the group’s existence, most of the public activism by Laszloffy and the Family Foundation has followed what is expected of Religious Right organizations.  They’re a consistent presence at the Montana Legislature opposing reproductive freedom, equality for the LGBT community, comprehensive sex education, and other favorite issues of the Religious Right.  They can be found regularly on the opinion pages of local newspapers, and they occasionally engage in community-level campaigns.[8]

Laszloffy and the Montana Family Foundation are probably best known as the catalyst behind the 2004 campaign that successfully banned gay marriage in Montana.[9]  Their opposition to equality runs deep.  They aggressively oppose any attempt at fairness and equal protection under the law for Montana’s LGBT community.  In 2009, when the Montana Supreme Court upheld a lesbian’s parental rights in the Kulstad case, Laszloffy said the decision would “go down in history as a black day for Montana’s parents and children.”  He said the verdict would “threaten the traditional definition of family for generations to come.”[10]

It’s readily apparent that Laszloffy and the Family Foundation don’t view debates over public policy as just differences of opinion.  Instead, these debates take on the religious overtones of good versus evil.  A prime example of this comes from a legislative update by Laszloffy for the Family Foundation during the 2011 session.  Laszloffy said that, while in a committee hearing, he looked around the room and God revealed to him:

“Those with depraved minds are trying to change the very fabric of our society so that we look more like Sodom than Montana…Not only do these people live lives steeped in sin, they rise every day to proclaim the virtue of their sin in a very public setting…As Paul says, they’ve been taken captive, they are truly prisoners of Satan….”[11]

In recent years, however, Laszloffy and the Family Foundation have increasingly strayed from the Religious Right’s standard “culture war” issues.  This isn’t too surprising given Laszloffy’s views before assuming control of the group.  A piece written in June 1999 by Laszloffy provides an example.  He echoed right-wing themes that would become hallmarks of the Tea Party Movement.  He claimed the federal government was promoting socialism and invoked the 10th Amendment as a remedy.  He complained about the national debt and warned that people shouldn’t be fooled by those who “tout more power at the federal level as the answer to all of our problems.”  The short piece could be used as a primer for today’s Tea Partiers.[12]

Also like the Tea Parties, Laszloffy and the Montana Family Foundation opposed national healthcare reform with fear mongering about how the federal government was pushing socialism.  They promoted a webcast that Laszloffy stated would address the “government takeover of healthcare” that was “taking us down the path to socialism.”  Additionally, Laszloffy and the Family Foundation opposed the Troubled Asset Relief Program and cap and trade legislation.  Laszloffy stated that all three issues were part of a “race towards socialism…[that] scares me.”  He complained that the country was heading towards a “national welfare state” that would “destroy what we used to call the American dream.”  Laszloffy promised that the Montana Family Foundation would battle this “march toward socialism.”[13]

Laszloffy, in his personal and professional capacities, and the Family Foundation have echoed the calls of the Tea Party Movement.  This was never more apparent than when Laszloffy and his group supported the “Birther Bill” during the 2011 Montana Legislature.[14]

Promoting the “Birther” Conspiracy

The “Birther” conspiracy takes many forms.  However, central to every version is that President Barack Obama is not the legitimate president of the United States, because “Birthers” believe he is not an American citizen.  One of the more common conspiracies claims Obama is a Kenyan-born Muslim, and that his birth documentation from Hawaii has been faked.  Numerous news agencies andorganizations have discredited the “Birther” conspiracy.  In April 2011, President Obama even released his long form birth certificate to try to end the controversy.  However, many “Birthers” believe that document is also a fake.  The “Birther” conspiracy originates from a core belief that an African-American could only be elected president as part of a sinister plan, which has taken decades to implement and includes faking birth records and birth notices in local newspapers.

During the 2011 Montana Legislature, Rep. Bob Wagner (R-Harrison) sponsored a bill that would have required presidential candidates to file an affidavit with the Montana Secretary of State declaring they met citizenship requirements, in addition to filing a certified copy of the candidate’s birth certificate.  Laszloffy testified in favor of the bill.  He stated there was a “question as to whether President Obama was born in the United States.”  He repeated the “Birther” conspiracy talking point about how a certificate of live birth was supposedly not a valid form of documentation.[15]

At the hearing, Laszloffy said he was not representing the Family Foundation.  However, he devoted a January 2011 update from the Family Foundation to the “Birther” topic.  He started off the segment by saying he had tried to avoid the topic.  However, he said there were persistent “rumors” that President Obama was born in Kenya, which raised questions about his eligibility to be president.  He complained that Obama “disparages” anyone questioning his legitimacy by calling them “Birthers.”  He noted that Montana legislators would consider this issue and try to make the president provide the “proof” that Obama was “unwilling or unable to provide.”  Wagner’s bill failed to make it out of committee, probably due both to its basis in outlandish conspiracy theory and Wagner’s embarrassing performance on a CNN news program.[16]

Working with Missoula Patriots

In addition to ideological crossover with the Tea Parties, Laszloffy and the Family Foundation are working with a Tea Party group while bringing Kitty Werthmann to Montana for fundraising events in Bozeman and Billings.  The Missoula Patriots were set to feature Werthmann at an event in Missoula before she headed to Bozeman and Billings.  In an e-mail promoting it, Missoula Patriots thanked Laszloffy and the Family Foundation for bringing Werthmann to Montana.  The group said Laszloffy was paying for “her air fare toMissoula for us…the Missoula Patriots [emphasis in original].”[17]

Gloria Roark and Nancy Engebretson started the Missoula Patriots in June 2009.  Saying they were “disenchanted with what the Republicans were doing,” they patterned their group after the Bitterroot-based Celebrating Conservatism.[18]  Celebrating Conservatism, an anti-government “patriot” group which currently appears dormant, was very active for about two years.[19]  It brought a long list of anti-government extremists into Ravalli County and western Montana starting in 2009.  These speakers included:  militia favorite Richard Mack; anti-Semitic tax protestor Red BeckmanOath Keepers founder Steward Rhodes; and failed Constitution Party presidential candidate Chuck Baldwin.

Similar to Celebrating Conservatism, Missoula Patriots likes to portray itself as a group dedicated to preserving the Constitution.  “People are afraid of losing their freedom,” Roark has told the press.  “We want to preserve the Constitution.”  The Missoula Patriots is active in Tea Party circles.  It’s listed as a member of the Montana Tea Party Coalition.  Additionally, representatives from the Missoula Patriots participated in the Montana Tea Party State Convention held in February 2011.[20]

 

Kitty Werthmann, Leader of South Dakota Eagle Forum

Following her presentation for the Missoula Patriots, Kitty Werthmann is headlining two fundraising events for the Montana Family Foundation.  The group has “Friends of the Family Fall Banquets” scheduled in Bozeman and Billings this week.[21]

Werthmann is a native of Austria and the South Dakota state leader for the Religious Right’s Eagle Forum.  She’s experienced a spike in her right-wing popularity over the past few years because of her comparisons between current events and Adolph Hitler’s Third Reich.  Her credibility rests on her living for seven years under Nazi rule in Austria as a child.[22]  She draws parallels between Austria under Nazi occupation and the United States under President Barack Obama.  The Family Foundation encourages people to attend its fundraising events to hear Werthmann’s “stern warning as America drifts towards socialism.”[23]

Werthmann gives an almost identical presentation wherever she goes.  Advertisements for a Freedom to Dictatorship video featuring Werthmann stated she helps people “see we are walking the same path as the Nazis.”  The video cites as proof such things as women in the workplace, euthanasia, and rising unemployment.  On the Eagle Forum website, Werthmann claims that liberals in America are promoting national identification cards and gun control, which she identifies as Nazi programs.[24]

At the “How to Take Back America Conference” in September 2009, Werthmann claimed that universal healthcare, the Equal Rights Amendment, and increased taxes were signs of Nazism.  An attendee asked her what people should do to stop America’s drift toward Nazism.  She exhorted people to not give up their guns and to buy more guns and ammunition.  “Don’t you dare give up your guns,” she said.  “Never, never, never!”  This response was greeted by an audience member saying, “Give them [guns] back one bullet at a time.”[25]

Werthmann’s last visit to Montana came in May 2010.  Celebrating Conservatism featured her as a speaker at its “Liberty Convention 2010” in Missoula.  Werthmann shared the speakers’ podium with a slate of presenters that included an anti-Semitic tax protestor, heroes of the militia movement, and an Alaskan “patriot” who is currently on trial for allegedly plotting to kill law enforcement officials.[26]

At the Liberty Convention, Werthmann used many of her standard talking points.  She discussed how the Third Reich promoted equality for women, which she said undermined the family.  She warned that the national healthcare system instituted by Hitler decimated a thriving Austrian one.  She compared that dynamic to what she said will happen under national healthcare reform in America.  She claimed President Obama established a “snitch program patterned after the Gestapo.”[27]

She also told a bizarre story that linked Soviet communism during the Cold War to current issues of immigration.  She claimed she attended the summit held in 1985 between President Ronald Reagan and Premier Mikhail Gorbachev in Geneva, Switzerland.  Werthmann claimed she infiltrated the peace movement at the summit.  She claimed she met members of the German Communist Party who had a private meeting scheduled with Gorbachev.  These women, according to Werthmann, said the Communist Party’s plan was to take over Latin American countries and establish a beachhead in Mexico to undermine America.  Werthmann said she came to the conclusion that pro-immigration forces were part of this communist plot.  She claimed one of the German women told her everything hinged on who was president, saying it would most likely culminate in 2008.[28]

As she routinely does, she told attendees of the Liberty Convention that, when people fear the government, that’s tyranny.  However, when the government fears the people, it means liberty.  She said she had travelled all around the country and knew that thousands of patriots were working hard to take the country back.[29]

The events for the Montana Family Foundation aren’t the first time she’s teamed up with Focus on the Family.  At a South Dakota presentation for that state’s Focus on the Family affiliate, she said that welfare became a “huge apparatus” under Hitler, where everyone had access to subsidized housing, food stamps, and other benefits.  “That’s called socialism,” she told the crowd.  She said that President Obama’s remarks about “spreading the wealth” during his campaign were a sign that America was drifting towards Nazism and socialism.[30]

Werthmann and the Tea Parties

Her comparisons of America under President Obama and Austria under Hitler have made her a favorite on the Tea Party speaking circuit over the past few years.  She’s been featured at Tea Party rallies in her home state and was the keynote speaker at the 2010 South Dakota Tea Party Summit.  A recap of the event stated she described “the parallels between the step by step loss of freedom in Austria and developments that have been in motion in the United States for years.”  She’s even been featured at Tea Party rallies on the East Coast, including in New Jersey and Pennsylvania.[31]

At one such New Jersey event in June 2011, Werthmann stuck mostly to her normal script, but did add a few new things.  She talked about how Hitler was a great orator, adding “we’ve heard that here, too, haven’t we.”  As a youth in Austria, she said she was part of the Hitler Youth, because it was compulsory.  She discussed how, under Hitler, schools engaged in “political indoctrination,” promoted single teen mothers, and “drove a wedge” between children and parents.  Throughout her remarks, she ended segments by saying, “That’s socialism.”  She told attendees they needed to “take our country back as we know it” by regaining control of the US Senate and the White House.[32]  Toward the end of her speech, she echoed something she said in Missoula at the Liberty Convention, telling the Tea Partiers:

“When the people fear the government, that’s tyranny, but when the government fears the people, that’s you, the Tea Party.  That’s liberty.  Keep your guns.  Keep your guns, and buy more guns.”[33]

National and regional Tea Party luminaries embrace Werthmann.  She’s appeared on Glenn Beck’s show on Fox News where she gave her standard stump speech and encouraged people to vote to take back the US House and US Senate.  When Beck spoke in South Dakota in 2010, Werthmann said she was glad Beck also preached about the dangers of socialism in America.  “I have been preaching for 30 years what socialism is all about. And now we are seeing it very clear,” she said. “I remember when people always thought I was a wacko — too far out, you know. But now, I’m being vindicated.”[34]

Werthmann has also appeared on the “Shad Olson Show.”  Shad Olson became a player in Tea Party circles after KOTA TV suspended him from his news anchor position for speaking at a 2010 Tea Party rally in South Dakota. Olson voluntarily resigned and started his “Shad Olson Show.”  By August 2010, he had helped start the South Dakota Tea Party Alliance.[35]

On the “Shad Olson Show,” Werthmann has compared what she views as favorable media coverage of President Obama to how Joseph Goebbels, the Third Reich Minister of Propaganda, ran the German media.  “History is coming back,” she warned.  “To me, it’s frightful, frightful seeing things coming back.”  On another program, Olson and Werthmann criticized comments President Obama made regarding Israel.  Olson said Obama was abandoning Israel and that it was important for America to keep Muslim countries in the region from annihilating the country.  Werthmann chimed in that Arabs and the Third Reich worked together to kill Jews.  “What Hitler couldn’t finish,” she said, “that is what Barack Obama is doing now.”  Olson agreed, saying that both were focused on “exterminating the Jewish race.”[36]

Conclusion

 

As Kitty Werthmann told the press in her home state, people have historically viewed her as a “wacko.”  She’s claimed vindication by finding people, especially in the Tea Party Movement, who are open to any conspiracy theories that perpetuate their hatred and distrust of President Obama.  Jeff Laszloffy and the Montana Family Foundation are promoting this same anti-government strain of thought and injecting a heavy dose of fear mongering about socialism supposedly taking over the country.  Additionally, they are adding racist conspiracy theories about President Obama to the mix and elevating speakers who compare Obama to Adolph Hitler.

It would be bad enough if the Family Foundation was just putting this type of extremist propaganda out into the community.  However, this week it is using Kitty Werthmann to raise money to support its work.  Her last appearance in Montana was at an anti-government convention where she shared the podium with the likes of an anti-Semitic tax protestor and other extremists.  Werthmann is the type of person to which the Family Foundation is hitching its cart.

The Family Foundation continues to gravitate towards and promote extreme right-wing conspiracies and the activists and organizations that promote them.  If it continues to do this, its political legitimacy as the main mouthpiece for Montana’s Religious Right could diminish.  Pat Robertson’s promotion of one-world-government conspiracy theories, and his use of anti-Semitic sources in doing so, played a part in the Christian Coalition of America’s diminishing power at the national level.[37]  The Montana Family Foundation partnering with people like Werthmann and the “Birthers” could have a similar impact in Montana.


[1] Shad Olson Show, May 25, 2011; Rapid City Journal, Oct. 27, 2010.

[2] Billings Gazette, Feb. 2, 2004.

[3] Rob Boston, Close Encounters with the Religious Right, Prometheus Books (2000), pp. 65-104.

[4] Great Falls Tribune, April 15, 1992; Missoulian, Jan. 18, 1992; Great Falls Tribune, April 15, 1992.  The Christian Coalition of Montana held a conference, titled “God’s Building an Army,” to launch the new organization in 1992.  A number of leading Republicans spoke at the conference, including Attorney General Marc Racicot (who would become Montana Governor and later chairman of the Republican National Committee), State GOP Chairman Rick Hill (who would be elected to the U.S. House), and various state legislators.  Ralph Reed of the national Christian Coalition was a featured speaker, and he urged the Montana group to operate secretively and deceptively as it mobilized for its political work in the state.

[5] Rob Boston, Close Encounters with the Religious Right, Prometheus Books (2000), pp. 68-74 and 180-197.

[6] Montana Human Rights Network, Network News, October 2003Billings Gazette, Feb. 2, 2004.

[7] Montana Family Foundation, website, “Mission Statement,” Oct. 26, 2011.

[8] Billings Gazette, Feb. 2, 2004; For an example of the Montana Family Foundation engaging in a local campaign, see:  Montana Human Rights Network, Network News, January 2011, p. 6.

[9] Montana Human Rights Network, Network News, November 2004, p. 6.

[10] Montana Family Foundation, e-mail, Oct. 6, 2009.

[11] Montana Family Foundation, “A Depraved Mind is a Sad Thing,” Feb. 4, 2011.

[12] Laurel Outlook, June 13, 1999.

[13] Montana Family Foundation, e-mail, July 24, 2009; Montana Family Foundation, “The March Toward Socialism,” July 24, 2009.

[14] For more on the Tea Party Movement and the “Birther” Conspiracy, please see:  Institute for Research and Education on Human Rights, Tea Party NationalismFall 2010.

[15] Montana Legislative Services, audio, hearing on House Bill 205, House State Administration Committee, Feb. 2, 2011.

[16] Montana Family Foundation, “The Birth of a President,” Jan. 26, 2011.

[17] Missoula Patriots, e-mail, Oct. 14, 2011.

[18] Missoulian, Jan. 23, 2010; Missoula Independent, Oct. 29, 2009.

[19] For more on Celebrating Conservatism, please see:  Montana Human Rights Network, Network News, April 2010, p. 5; Montana Human Rights Network, Network News, December 2009, p. 8.

[20] Missoulian, Jan. 23, 2010; Missoula Independent, Oct. 29, 2009; Montana Human Rights Network, archives, notes from Montana Tea Party State Convention, Feb. 18-19, 2011.

[21] Montana Family Foundation, e-mail, Sept. 16, 2011.

[22]  Worldnet Daily, Sept. 22, 2009; Dakota Voice, Nov. 12, 2009.

[23] Montana Family Foundation, e-mail, Sept. 16, 2011.

[24] The Prophecy Club, “Freedom to Dictatorship in 5 Years,” May 12, 2010; Eagle Forum, “Freedoms Can Disappear in a Hurry if We Aren’t Careful,” 2003.

[25] Anti-Defamation League, Rage Grows in America (2009), p. 11; The Washington Independent, Sept. 28, 2009; Think Progress, “Right-Wing Conference Tells Activists to Get Their Guns Ready for ‘Bloody Battle’ with Obama the Nazi,” Sept. 28, 2009.

[26] For a recap of the Liberty Convention, please see:  Montana Human Rights Network, Network News, August 2010, p. 10.

[27] Montana Human Rights Network, archives, notes from Liberty Convention, May 21, 2010.

[28] Ibid.

[29] Ibid.

[30] Dakota Voice, Nov. 12, 2009.

[31] Dakota Voice, Feb. 27, 2010; Capital Journal, Dec. 6, 2009; Shad Olson Show, June 29, 2011.

[32] You Tube, “Let Freedom Ring June 28 2011 Kitty Werthmann,” June 28, 2011.

[33] Ibid.

[34] Glenn Beck Show, Sept. 24, 2010; Rapid City Journal, Oct. 27, 2010.

[35] Rapid City Journal, May 12, 2010; Rapid City Journal, Aug. 14, 2010.

[36] Shad Olson Show, June 29, 2011; Shad Olson Show, May 25, 2011.

[37] For examples, see:  Pat Robertson, The New World Order, Word Publishing (1991); Right-Wing Watch, “The Perils of Wooing Pat Robertson,” Nov. 7, 2007.

Bozeman Letter To The Editor: Gays, “Just live the lifestyle you’ve chosen and keep quiet.”

From yesterday’s Bozeman Daily Chronicle comes the following letter. I thought it would be online today, but apparently it is not. I’ve transcribed it for your convenience.

To the Montana Gay Pride group and Tom Marsh, director:

A few questions:

Why do you have to openly march on the streets of Bozeman? Not all people flaunt their lifestyles before the public. Can’t you quietly live your lives the way we do? Just live the lifestyle you’ve chosen and keep quiet. If everyone with grievances to air acted like your group, our news media would be very busy.

Why were you unhappy before you came out? Why does it please you that Bozeman officials condone your actions? Can’t you live among us and remain silent and happy?

Alice Cooper
Belgrade 

I don’t know where to begin. But I will say, Tom Marsh is a dear friend- and I don’t respond well when people personally attack my friends.
So, I’ve taken more than a day to formulate a few salient points in a letter:

Dear Alice,

You asked a lot of questions in your letter to the editor in the Bozeman Daily Chronicle on October 21st, 2011. I would like to address them

People do not choose their sexual orientation. They acknowledge it. It is not a mental or physical illness to identify as Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgendered or Intersex. Both the American Psychological Association and The American Medical Association agree with me- and they have for decades. Science is with me on this. Firmly.

We openly march, because we have to. Somewhere there is a child who doesn’t understand that people don’t choose their sexual orientation- and that child may grow up miserable, tortured and conflicted. And, according to statistics, will probably think about and attempt to take their lives as a result of that conflict and torture. I did. We march so that people will see that it is a part of the human condition to be LGBT. We are your neighbors, members of your family, in every occupation and human situation you can think of. We’re here, and it’s okay to be. And we march because there are still people who think it’s okay to hate us. We march so that maybe those people will realize that we are not monsters. We are human beings. And maybe there will be less children who think that God hates them, or that they’re less than other children simply because they are LGBT. If so, then one little annual parade is a small thing….

We would love to live our lives quietly- but there are laws (and lack thereof) and attitudes that prevent that. We don’t always feel safe. We aren’t always treated with dignity and respect. We don’t have equal protection under the law. Believe you me, I would love nothing more than to live my life quietly- and I will- when I am treated like every other person in this country and this state- because it’s hard to live a normal life when there are people just like me who are threatened with violence all over this country. It’s hard to live a happy life when you’re afraid.

If you want to know why we were unhappy before we came out, it’s pretty simple: because we were lying. Lying makes people unhappy. Stopping the lie is cause for celebration. And so we march and dance and celebrate being honest together.

And yes, it pleases us that Bozeman officials recognize the struggle to live a normal life in the face of being labelled a freak by a significant part of society. It pleases us to not be seen as freaks. Because we’re not. We’re just human beings who love and work and struggle just like you, Alice. Human beings of faith, spirit and purpose. Human beings with families and pets and houses and churches and favorite restaurants.

I also wonder if, in your letter, you substituted the word “Christian” or “Irish” or “Black” or “Woman” or “Immigrant”  for the word “Gay”, would you feel the same?

We do live among you. We do. And we’re not going to do it silently. That’s not how a democracy works. I live in The United States of America, and I have a right to free speech- as do you. Silence is not an option. Because you have written the above letter to a public newspaper, I’m sure you understand.

If you have any other questions, I will be happy to answer them as openly and honestly as I can.

Sincerely,

D Gregory Smith, stl, MA
Licensed Mental Health Counselor

Write your own Letter to the Editor of The Bozeman Daily chronicle here. 

Update: Online version of the letter (with a place to comment) here.